Many
Nigerian entertainers are evading tax, not because some of them intentionally
want to but because they don’t understand their taxable income. Likewise, the
government of Nigeria, through all her tax agencies is losing billions of Naira
every year from the entertainment sector because they are yet to discover a
proper structure for taxation of the entertainment industry.
Understanding
taxation of the entertainment industry helps in managing entertainment tax
issues, know how the law characterizes ownership rights and interests, choose a
business form that provides maximum tax advantage, determine the best time to
report and recognize income, reduce the tax burden through deductions,
depreciation, and the investment tax credit. It also helps in paying close
attention to the special tax considerations that apply to talent.
A
good understanding of Taxation of the Entertainment Industry will help
entertainment practitioners spot unique issues before they become problems,
interpret rules and regulations correctly, make business decisions that lower
taxes, and ensure compliance with the law.
Show
Business is one of the most of the most lucrative businesses in the world. This
is true especially when it comes to tax planning for entertainers. Although
taxpayers in the entertainment industry face tax planning issues similar to
those of other high net worth individuals, the nature of the industry creates
unique areas of exposure. From the various types of income, to the maximization
of deductions and benefits, this article will highlight the need for tax
planning that is as creative as the individuals being taxed.
The
type of income entertainers receive depends on the activities or services
performed and their rights as per contractual agreement. Entertainers involved
in film and television production, including actors and other employees of
studios and production companies, generally receive wages or salaries for their
performance or compensation based on net profits or gross receipts of the
production. Additionally, actors may receive residuals, payments for past
performances and re-runs of television shows, movies, and commercials which are
considered personal services income and are treated as wages.
Copyright
owners, such as authors, recording artists, and songwriters, receive payments
in the form of royalties or license fees. Royalties are periodic payments
generated by the sale of copyrighted material. As intellectual property
protected under copyright laws, the sale and license of copyrights could be
subject to favorable capital gains treatment as opposed to being treated as
ordinary income.
Celebrities
also receive endorsement income for recommending products or making
appearances, and participating in photograph sessions for their sponsors.
Whether such income will be treated as royalty income (i.e., license of
intangible property) or personal services income will depend on the actual
purpose of compensation (usually defined in the contract). The income will be
considered royalty income if the entertainer is paid for the right to use his
name and likeness (e.g., his face on a shirt). However, if the entertainer is
compensated for a performance, or an appearance in commercials or interviews,
the income will be characterized as personal services income.
Entertainers
are also compensated in forms other than cash. Fringe benefits and goods, such
as wardrobes, housing, meals, travel and transportation, given to entertainers
in lieu of, or in addition to, cash payments are considered compensation and
should be included in their taxable income.
To
understand fully the subject matter, it is helpful to become acquainted with
the terminology that is unique to the entertainment industry. Certain key terms
are defined below-
Talent:
the actors, artistes, writers and directors are referred to as “talent”
Above
–the-line and below- the – line costs: motion picture costs are often
categorized as either ‘Above the line” costs or below the line costs. “Above
the line” costs are payments to creative and executive personnel, such as
talent. “Below the line” costs are all expenses that relate to the actual
on-site shooting of the film and the post production costs (such as editing and
soundtrack)
Deficit
financing: in the television industry, it is common for a network to finance a
substantial portion of the cost of a television show. The producer must provide
the balance of financing through sales of foreign rights or loans. This process
is often referred to as “deficit financing”
P
and A: after a film is completed, it must be distributed. In the case of a
so-called theatrical release (a release through motion picture theaters),
substantial costs are incurred in making duplicate film prints and in
advertising. These costs are often referred to as prints and advertising (P and
A).
Participations-
Talent will often receive participations entitling them to payments based on a
percentage of the revenues from the film. Participations are usually tied to
net revenue and are defined in such a way that they rarely earned. If the
talent has a strong bargaining position, they may have a participation tied to
gross revenues, which is certain to earn them at least some income.
Residuals-
Residuals are essentially the same as participations, but then the term
residuals is used when the payments are made to unions pursuant to guild
agreement.
Negative
pick –up: Negative pick –up is an agreement whereby a distributor agrees in
advance to acquire worldwide rights in a film in perpetuity upon delivery by
the producer. The distributor agrees to pay the producer a fixed amount upon
delivery of the film and to make additional payments contingent on success of
the film. The producer pledges the distribution agreement to a bank in exchange
for a loan to use in the production of the film. As long as the film meets
certain pre-approved criteria, the distributor must accept delivery, and the
distributor’s payment is being used to pay down the bank loan.
PFD
Agreement: in a “production, finance and distribution agreement” (a PFD
agreement), a distributor acquires worldwide rights in perpetuity and owns all
film rights during production, by directly funding all cost of production. The
distributor has the right to make changes during production as long as the
distributor pays for any additional cost. The producer is entitled to fixed
producer’s fee plus contingent compensation based on the success of the film.
Many
entertainers are paid under deferred compensation arrangements through which
they avoid current taxation by deferring their income to future years. However,
only deferred compensation plans that meet strict requirements should be
respected.
Entertainers
often “go where the money is,” that is, where their work takes them. As such,
they can be subject to tax in many states, particularly because their whereabouts
can easily be tracked due to their celebrity status. Entertainers are normally
subject to tax in their resident state based on worldwide income. Entertainers
may also be subject to tax in nonresident states to the extent that income was
derived or “sourced” to that state. In order to determine the states in which
their income is sourced, entertainers must determine “where performance occurs”
and how many days they worked within that state over total days worked. A
proper assessment of income sourcing and allocation is the key. There are many
ways to minimize tax in the entertainment industry but proper tax planning is
imperative.
To
be continued……..
*Additional
information by Schuyler Moore AND WTAS
No comments:
Post a Comment
What Do You Think?